I am writing in response to the article "Cruel" on Saturday, Nov. 6.
A similar incident occurred in our neighbourhood a few years ago. The bowhunter killed a young bear in his own backyard then used the meat to feed his family. I wonder how many arrows were discharged until the cub submitted to its death?
He told the authorities that he was protecting his family. I live in an area of the city where I am fortunate enough to see many bears during their waking seasons. Full grown bears run away from humans when they realize a human is present and building their trust requires many encounters. Cubs would be exponentially fearful.
The neighbours who expressed their concern to the city were told that residents have the right to kill on their property if their lives are endangered.
How dangerous is a fearful cub? My husband and I have lived in many cities during our lifetime together and have never heard of such a regulation by local authorities.
Upon occasion, bears have to be destroyed for their aggressive behaviour. Two bears in our area, which were destroyed by conservation officers, had mangled paws from traps that humans had set.
They lived their lives in pain because of the cruelty of some people. In the time that it takes to obtain a bow, the hunter could very easily make a call to authorities, who would handle the situation far more professionally if there were such a need.
This would take the responsibility out of the whims of a local resident of the city and into the hands of authorities, who are properly trained to handle these situations.
The regulation should include setting traps in city limits, which pose a danger to both animals and humans alike.
Doing so would ensure the safety of other residents living in or visiting the area. Indeed, the laws have to be changed for the protection of all and end the inhuman, senseless and self- indulgent killing.
Diana Tallman
Prince George
