I have just read one of Todd Whitcombe's opinion pieces and was disappointed that it did not contain the normal detail they have contained in the past.
He said that is because you limit his content to 375 words and he can't describe what he wanted to in what space he had. Three-hundred-and-seventy-five words is not enough to explain anything in the detail necessary for a complete understanding, especially with the subjects that Todd takes on.
You are allowing me more that that just for this contact. Surely you don't limit reporters to those kinds of restrictions?
Peter Bowen
Prince George
